翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Melaneelithanallur block ・ Melanelia ・ Melanelixia ・ Melanella ・ Melanella abida ・ Melanella acicula ・ Melanella aciculata ・ Melanella acuformis ・ Melanella adamantina ・ Melanella aequatorialis ・ Melanella aethiopica ・ Melaleuca wonganensis ・ Melaleuca xerophila ・ Melaleuca zeteticorum ・ Melaleuca zonalis ・ Melaleuca, Inc. v. Hansen ・ Melaleuca, Tasmania ・ Melaleuca, Western Australia ・ Melaleucantha ・ Melaleucia ・ Melaleucia leucomera ・ Melaleucia obliquifasciata ・ Melaleucia tertia ・ Melaleucia uparta ・ Melalinjipattu ・ Melaloncha ・ Melam ・ Melam (chemistry) ・ Melam Kottu Thali Kattu ・ Melamadai Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Melaleuca, Inc. v. Hansen ： ウィキペディア英語版 Melaleuca, Inc. v. Hansen ''Melaleuca, Inc. v. Hansen '' was a United States District Court for the District of Idaho case which clarified the meaning of "internet access provider" and "direct adverse" effect as used in the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003, or CAN-SPAM Act of 2003, Among several claims, Melaleuca Inc. claimed that Hansen violated the "CAN-SPAM" Act by emailing Melaleuca executives and trying to induce them to leave the company. Hansen filed a motion to dismiss for lack of standing on the CAN-SPAM claims. The court dismissed spam claims due to lack of standing (law) under the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. ==Background== Hansen was an independent marketing executive for a multi-level marketing company called ITV.〔 One of Hansen's work tasks involved getting customers to join ITV as marketing executives. Hansen e-mailed some of Melaleuca's marketing executives, informing them about ITV and inviting them to discover new business opportunities. Some of these individuals were users of an "i-glide" email service. Melaleuca owned the domain name "i-glide.net", which provided its employees with the option of purchasing Internet services, including email. It provided these services through a third party internet service provider called IP Applications. As such, it did not have control or access to the hardware that enabled access to i-glide customers, nor did it control the spam filters applied to the emails. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Melaleuca, Inc. v. Hansen」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.